This is such a smart observation about curation and discovery. The serendipity of "hard to classify" sections actually mirrors how breakthrough ideas often happen, when concepts from disparate fields bump into eachother. I stumbled across a philosophy-cookbook pairing once that completely changed how I thnk about methodology. These unconventional adjacencies can produce way more value than rigid taxonomies ever could.
This is such a smart observation about curation and discovery. The serendipity of "hard to classify" sections actually mirrors how breakthrough ideas often happen, when concepts from disparate fields bump into eachother. I stumbled across a philosophy-cookbook pairing once that completely changed how I thnk about methodology. These unconventional adjacencies can produce way more value than rigid taxonomies ever could.
Beautifully said. I was trying to get to that in the article but you said it much more elegantly. Thank you!